A fragment of a daily household account of wheat, recording rations for slaves and a prisoner Demetrios and the flour used for bread and cakes. On the 8th it records extra wheat for the table of guests invited to the Basileia, the festival of the Ptolemaic kingship. It dates to the mid 3rd century BC, probably from Philadelphia in the Fayum.
In English machine translation
[recto]
[…] of these
⟦…⟧
⟦and⟧ the ration for the slaves, with the addition of Demetrios the prisoner, from the 3rd to the 6th, per day 1 choinix, total 4 choinikes; total 1/2 (artaba) [9] choinikes
of purified (wheat) with flat-cakes 9 choinikes, 1/2, total 1/4 (artaba) 9 choinikes
total of wheat 1 artaba 8 choinikes; remainder 12 1/2 1/4 artabas 1 1/2 choinikes
7th: from the account of wheat 12 1/2 1/4 artabas 1 1/2 choinikes, of which
of unsifted wheat 1/2 artaba 6 choinikes
of purified 7 1/2 choinikes, total 1/4 (artaba) 5 choinikes
total of wheat 1 artaba 1 choinix; remainder 11 1/2 1/4 artabas 1/2 choinix
[8th]: from the account of wheat 11 1/2 1/4 artabas 1/2 choinix, of which ⟦…⟧
of unsifted wheat, with the addition of
[…] 1 1/2 choinikes, total 1/2 (artaba) 6 1/2 choinikes
of purified, for the table for those invited to the Basileia, 1/2 1/4 (artaba) 7 choinikes, total 1 1/2 1/4 artabas 4 choinikes
for sacrificial-meat (cakes?) […] 2 choinikes, total 4 choinikes
for unbaked (?) flat cakes 2 choinikes, total 4 choinikes
small cakes […] 6 choinikes, total 1/4 (artaba) 2 choinikes
sesame cakes […] 2 choinikes, total [4] choinikes
[…] choinikes
[verso]
[…]
The Basileia was a festival commemorating the Ptolemaic accession to kingship. Fractions of the artaba (1/2, 1/4) and choinikes are combined in the original reckoning; 'unsifted' (autopyros) and 'purified' wheat refer to grades of flour.
Working translation of the DDbDP edition, made with Claude Opus 5.5 from the edition and the catalogue records shown below (catalogued as Fragment of account of household wheat). It has not been reviewed by a papyrologist: check the edition before citing. Restorations follow the edition; […] marks lost text and (?) an uncertain reading.