Copy of a rescript of the emperors Septimius Severus and Caracalla, posted at Alexandria, ruling that a man who cedes his property to escape a compulsory public service must cede it to the person who nominated him, not to the imperial treasury. It is followed by the opening of an application to the strategos of the Oxyrhynchite nome by Aurelius Herakleides of Talao, who had been nominated beyond his means as collector of village money taxes and evidently invokes the rescript.
In English machine translation
The deified Severus and Antoninus to Capito son of Hermophantos.
If, as you say, you ceded your property because of the burden of the liturgy, it is reasonable that the cession be made not to our treasury but to the person who nominated you to the liturgy, who, taking over your possessions, will provide your civic assessment and will fulfil the liturgy. For our treasury does not accept such cessions, nor will your civic status be harmed, nor will you be outraged in your person. Posted in year 8, Mecheir, at Alexandria.
To Aurelius Leonidas, strategos of the Oxyrhynchite nome, from Aurelius Herakleides son of Petronios, his mother being Plutarche, from the village of Talao. Having been nominated beyond my means by Horos son of Horos, his mother being Kalamine, to the collectorship of the village money revenues of the same Talao […] and places […] to hold out […] through you […]
[…]
The cession of property (cessio bonorum) was a recognised way to escape a liturgy; the rescript's year 8 of Severus corresponds to AD 200, but the application itself is later, since the emperors are called deified and the petitioner bears the name Aurelius. The phrase translated 'civic assessment' (timema) refers to the property qualification for the liturgy.
Working translation of the DDbDP edition, made with Claude Opus 5.5 from the edition and the catalogue records shown below (catalogued as Rescript of Severus; Application to a Strategus). It has not been reviewed by a papyrologist: check the edition before citing. Restorations follow the edition; […] marks lost text and (?) an uncertain reading.