A private letter from Servilius to his 'brother' Nemesion at Philadelphia in the Fayum, listing goods sent via his son-in-law Julius and a soldier Antonius: papyrus sheets, Italian rose oil, a ring, an engraved stone with Harpokrates, copper sulphate, sweets and pine cones for the children. He also gives instructions about selling grain and asks Nemesion to look after the household.
In English machine translation
[recto]
Servilius to Nemesion his brother, very many greetings and good health.
What you wrote to me about in your letter I have done. Receive from Julius my son-in-law five sheets of papyrus and a kotyle and a quarter of first-quality Italian rose oil; for the kotyle I paid 8 drachmas, gladly. And receive from Antonius son of Leonidas, soldier of the cohort, a little ring of two quarters. A small stone of silphium such as you wrote to me about I did not find, but one was bought for 2 drachmas 3 obols on which there is a Harpokrates. Receive these from Antonius, and half a mina of copper sulphate; receive them sealed as you write to me. And here copper sulphate is not to be found. And a little basket of sweetmeats and ten pine cones for the children. Whatever you need, write and I will do it. And you, keep company with Julius my son-in-law until you receive either the grain or the money; if you receive the grain, sell it at the current price. Look after the children and Thermouthis and everyone in the house, and you write to me about people whom I do not know. I went off to the (village) of Herakleides and found nothing […]
[…]
[… lines lost …]
[verso]
[…] to Nemesion at Philadelphia
'Brother' may be a term of affection rather than kinship. The 'stone of silphium' was probably an engraved gem or amulet stone; the ring's weight 'two quarters' is of uncertain unit.
Working translation of the DDbDP edition, made with Claude Opus 5.5 from the edition and the catalogue records shown below (catalogued as Lettre de Serouilios à Nemesiôn). It has not been reviewed by a papyrologist: check the edition before citing. Restorations follow the edition; […] marks lost text and (?) an uncertain reading.