A receipt in which Emsigesis alias Berenike acknowledges receiving from Dionysios son of Kephalas 45 artabas of wheat owed under a contract with her husband Horos alias Apollonios, who had fled and could not be found. She guarantees that no further claim will be made, under penalty of 5 bronze talents; it was written for her by Thoas because she was illiterate, in the Hermopolite nome in 111 BC.
In English machine translation
[recto]
Emsigesis also called Berenike, daughter of Leonides, Persian woman, to Dionysios son of Kephalas, greetings. I acknowledge that I have received from you, on behalf of Horos also called Apollonios, my husband, the 45 artabas of wheat under the double contract (symbolon) which you made with him in year 54, which is also year 1, because he has fled and cannot be found, and that neither Horos himself nor anyone else on his behalf will proceed against you concerning the aforesaid double contract, which he has received in full, nor concerning any part of it, on any pretext whatsoever. If he does proceed, the action of Horos and of anyone proceeding on his behalf shall be invalid, and Horos shall pay in addition to Dionysios, for each time he proceeds, a penalty of 5 talents of bronze and the damages, and nonetheless this note of hand shall be valid wherever it is produced.
Farewell.
Year 7, Thoth […].
I, Thoas son of Apollonios, have written on behalf of the aforementioned Emsigesis, at her instruction, because she does not know letters.
[verso]
Note of hand of Emsigesis on behalf of Horos her husband: receipt for the loan of her husband, 45 artabas of wheat, which he has received.
The double date 'year 54, which is also year 1' reflects the overlapping regnal counting of Ptolemy VIII and his successors (117/116 BC). The verso calls it a loan receipt, though the text concerns wheat due to the husband, and the edition's 'his' at line 5 appears garbled.
Working translation of the DDbDP edition, made with Claude Opus 5.5 from the edition and the catalogue records shown below (catalogued as Quittance de remboursement d’un prêt de blé). It has not been reviewed by a papyrologist: check the edition before citing. Restorations follow the edition; […] marks lost text and (?) an uncertain reading.