Papyrus Inscribed in Hieratic
Description
Caption: Papyrus Inscribed in Hieratic, ca. 1292–1190 B.C.E.. Papyrus, ink, Glass: 7 5/8 x 9 9/16 in. (19.3 x 24.3 cm) Largest Fragment: 7/8 x 4 1/4 in. (2.2 x 10.8 cm). Brooklyn Museum, Charles Edwin Wilbour Fund, 37.903E. (Photo: Brooklyn Museum)
The same text in other collections
Linked by shared inventory number
(ORAEC-id oraec4119).
Each record below describes this same artifact or text from a different angle.
- Brieffragment / pBrooklyn 37.903 L ORAEC textMedinet Habu
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
Fragmentary strip of papyrus with dark ink hieratic text arranged in horizontal lines across multiple torn pieces.
The image shows several irregular papyrus fragments mounted on a light-gray backing inside a framed display. The papyrus is yellow-brown with jagged edges and one or more pieces overlapping slightly. Across the strips are dark, brown-black marks consistent with hieratic cursive, laid out in lines running mostly left-to-right. No clear cartouche, royal titulary box, or fully legible proper name is visible at this resolution. There are no visible figural scenes; the decoration appears entirely text-based. At the bottom edge, a small label-like strip is visible but is too indistinct to read reliably as museum catalog text. No Greek/Coptic/Arabic text is apparent.
Cross-references (3)
- BKM-Accession 37.903E tier-2
- BKM-Object 117489 tier-2
- ORAEC-id oraec4119 tier-2 (inventory-match)
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Brooklyn Museum — Egyptian, Classical, Ancient Near Eastern Art.
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.