ORAEC (Online Resource for Ancient Egyptian Corpus) · architecture

Grabherren-Beischrift / Südwand (Festszene) Gisa

Source of record: ORAEC (Online Resource for Ancient Egyptian Corpus) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

〈Grabinschriften des Alten Reiches〉→Gisa→West Field 〈(PM III, 47-179)〉→Mastaba des Seschemnefer III (G 5170)→〈Mastaba〉→Opferkammer→Südwand (Festszene)→Grabherren-Beischrift

Inscriptions (1)

Inscription #1 · Egyptian

Transcription

zꜣ-nswt-n-ẖ,t≡f ḥꜣ,tj-ꜥ (j)m(,j)-jz ẖr(,j)-ḥ(ꜣ)b(,t) tꜣ,tj-zꜣb-ṯꜣ,tj ḫt-Mnw (j)m(,j)-rʾ-kꜣ,t-nb(,t)-n,t-nswt (j)m(,j)-rʾ-pr,wj-ꜥḥꜣ,w ḥr,j-sštꜣ-n-wḏ,t-mdw-n,t-nswt ḥr,j-sštꜣ-n-pr-dwꜣ,t smr-wꜥ,tj Sšm-nfr

Translations (2)

EN AI · OpenAI gpt-4o-mini (from scholarly German)
The physical son of the king, Hatia (rank title), servant in the office, lector priest, vizier, follower of Min, overseer of all the work of the king, overseer of the two armories, keeper of the secret regarding the command of the king, keeper of the secret of the morning house and sole friend (of the king) Seschem-nefer.
DE scholarly · TLA / ORAEC
Der leibliche Königssohn, Hatia (Rangtitel), Diensttuender im Büro, Vorlesepriester, Wesir, Gefolgsmann des Min, Vorsteher jeder Arbeit des Königs, Vorsteher der beiden Waffenhäuser, Hüter des Geheimnisses über den Befehl des Königs, Hüter des Geheimnisses des Morgenhauses und einziger Freund (des Königs) Seschem-nefer.

Connections

Found at Giza

Cross-references (2)

  • TLA-Text MMODOGTRIZETBJ3YQTWPPX6FZA tier-1
  • ORAEC-id oraec10846 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by ORAEC (Online Resource for Ancient Egyptian Corpus).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.