A petition from Aurelius Pakysis, a priest of the temple at Soknopaiou Nesos, to a centurion about wheat stolen from his storeroom through a hole bored in the floor. The occupants had promised through the village police chief to pay 7 artabas of wheat but did not, so he asks that two accused men be brought before the centurion. Dated 7 April 216.
In English machine translation
To Aurelius Calvisius Maximus, centurion,
from Aurelius Pakysis son of Tesenouphis, priest and stolistes of the notable temple of the village of Soknopaiou Nesos in the Herakleides division.
I have a room in the house of the wife of my son Aurelius Tesenouphis in the hamlet called Pisai in the Themistos division, in which is stored my wheat set aside for maintenance. Recently, then, when my household members entered the room, since I was in Alexandria, the wheat was not found, having been carried off. The cause of the theft appeared to be that, the room being an upper storey, the crime was committed by boring through the floor. When those living inside were confronted, on the grounds that this had happened through their abuse, they promised, through the chief of police of the village and through others, to give 7 artabas of wheat on account of the theft. But since they agreed to the promise but have not until now come forward with the payment, I am compelled to take refuge with you and I ask that the accused, Panouphis son of Stotoetis and Pakysis son of Kanneis, be brought, so that by your authority I may recover, in place of the greater amount stolen, the 7 artabas of wheat settled on me. Farewell.
I, Aurelius Pakysis, have submitted this.
Year 24 of Marcus Aurelius Severus Antoninus Parthicus Maximus Britannicus Maximus Germanicus Maximus Pius Augustus, Pharmouthi 12.
A stolistes was a priest responsible for robing the cult statues. The theft took place at Pisai in the Themistos division, not at the petitioner's home village.
Working translation of the DDbDP edition, made with Claude Opus 5.5 from the edition and the catalogue records shown below (catalogued as Eingabe an einen centurio). It has not been reviewed by a papyrologist: check the edition before citing. Restorations follow the edition; […] marks lost text and (?) an uncertain reading.