Herakleides son of Akous, from the Small Oasis, acknowledges that he has received back from Ammonianos, a man of the village-scribe class of the Ammoniake, through Ammonianos' friend Herakleides of Oxyrhynchus, 360 silver drachmas he had deposited with him in the fourth year. He renounces all further claims and declares the earlier security documents void; dated 1 October 198 at Oxyrhynchus.
In English machine translation
[recto]
Herakleides son of Akous, his mother being Diogenis, from Aphrodisiou of the Small Oasis, acknowledges that he has received from Ammonianos son of Sarammon, his mother being Helene, from the class of village scribes of the Ammoniake, through Herakleides son of Chairemon, his mother being Dionysia, from the city of Oxyrhynchus, friend of Ammonianos, the 360 silver drachmas of the coinage of the Augusti, total 360 drachmas, which he deposited with him when he was in the Ammoniake in the fourth year; and he makes no claim nor will make any claim about this nor about anything else whatever, written or unwritten, up to the present day, because he has received it in full. And the documents of security for them which he happened to issue to him at that time are to be invalid and void. The acknowledgement, written in duplicate, is valid.
Year 7 of the Emperors Caesars Lucius Septimius Severus Pius Pertinax Arabicus Adiabenicus Parthicus Maximus and Marcus Aurelius Antoninus, Augusti, Phaophi 4.
I, Herakleides son of Akous, the aforementioned, have received from Ammonianos through Herakleides the 360 drachmas which I deposited with him when I was in the Ammoniake in the fourth year, and I make no claim against you, but everything is as stated above.
Sent to Ammonianos.
[verso]
…
The Ammoniake is the region of the Siwa Oasis (oasis of Ammon); 'class of village scribes' renders eidos komogrammateon, apparently a status designation. The verso traces are illegible.
Working translation of the DDbDP edition, made with Claude Opus 5.5 from the edition and the catalogue records shown below (catalogued as Acknowledgement of Return of Deposit). It has not been reviewed by a papyrologist: check the edition before citing. Restorations follow the edition; […] marks lost text and (?) an uncertain reading.