Court proceedings concerning an attack and Egyptian incantations TM 27874Apollonopolites HeptakomiasAnfang II

[Column 1] … […] to those around […] […] advocate […] that […] […] to you another […] from […] of Panouris […] and Paboïs son of Psenpech[…] Pcheris […] […] for he can […] against our people […] being examined by […]monios and […] brother, when […] of the village of Naboöi, Dioskouris son of Psena[…] […] might take those in the […] of the village […] from the village […] of it […] the attack […] saying [Column 2] But when an examination took place in the […] year by the former prefect Laberius Maximus […] that Asklas son of Poueris had been sought […] the one then sought […] And the cause […] you were seen neither by those around him. This Asklas [harassed?] me with the […] that occurred […] deliberately he was in the liturgies so that he might escape notice […] they wish to do something against our people […] […] those who with certain Egyptian incantations against our people […] a certain Psenteuaris from Naboöi; Osarpasas son of Horos from Krekis [in the Antaiopolite nome] until now has not been brought before you, although your edict […] by attacks the Heptakomia […] being men […] to Onnophris the priest […] about the attack Onnophris said […] they named only […] of the priests. Onnophris: I, about the attack […], these men now like to tell the truth and it seems […] he having died and that one having been expelled, prove […] [So-and-so] ordered Pcheris the eirenophylax and Pnasis son of Petemenekysis [to provide sureties] with a written undertaking, to produce [Osarpasas] within 30 days, [and] Asklas to be handed over to prison […] what they learned about those from Naboöi […] that no attack had occurred, he ordered […] Artorius Priscillus ordered […]