
stelae
AI image analysis GPT-5.4-nano
Machine-generated from the object's image on Jul 2026. Not curatorial; treat deities, names, and signs below as the model's best reading, not authority.
A rectangular stone stela covered with densely carved hieroglyphs and multiple figures in relief across the upper and middle registers, with additional text on the lower portion.
The image shows a tall, rectangular stone stela with a weathered surface. The upper section contains relief scenes and several distinct human/standing figures and/or offering or ritual elements, surrounded and labeled by hieroglyphic lines. The middle and lower registers are filled with tightly packed hieroglyphs in horizontal rows, with some larger sign groups that may represent titles or formulae. No clear painted color survives; the relief appears carved and then abraded. There is no clearly legible royal name cartouche or any unambiguous deity figure clearly identifiable at this resolution; therefore deities and royal names are recorded as unknown/unclear. No Greek, Coptic, or Arabic script is visible; only Egyptian hieroglyphic signs are apparent.
Inscriptions (3)
Transcription
Htp di [nsw] ptH nfr-Hr wsir xnty imntyw inpw Hr DHwty di.sn iw anan n Sna tw hHr sbAw n Xrty-nTr hA r wia mi smsww nTr xp.f r nTr n kA n Hry nbw n Hwt-nbw ms nTrw pA-nHsy mAa xrw sA Hry nbw pA-ra-m-Hb mAa xrw ms n nbt pr Smayt n imn [tA]-mi mAa[t] xrwTranslations (1)
Transcription
rnpt (HAt-sp) 4 n bA-n-ra-mry-n-imnTranslations (1)
Transcription
ptH Sps sty Ra nfr Hr sDm nHwtTranslations (1)
Connections
Similar inscriptions · by content embedding
About this record's data
- From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by Fitzwilliam Museum — Department of Antiquities (Egyptian).
- AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
- Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
- Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.

