ORAEC (Online Resource for Ancient Egyptian Corpus) · other

rechtes Signalement / Bildfeld rechts vom Durchgang

Source of record: ORAEC (Online Resource for Ancient Egyptian Corpus) — catalogued by the holding institution. View the original record →

Description

〈Grabinschriften des Alten Reiches〉→Gisa→West Field 〈(PM III, 47-179)〉→Mastaba des Mer-ib (G 2100 I-annexe)→Opferkapelle→Ostwand→Bildfeld rechts vom Durchgang→rechtes Signalement

Inscriptions (1)

Inscription #1 · Egyptian

Transcription

zꜣ-nswt-n-ẖ,t≡f smr ẖr(,j)-ḥ(ꜣ)b(,t) ḫtm,w-nṯr-wjꜣ-Bꜣ-nṯr,w 〈〈ḫtm,w-nṯr〉〉-wjꜣ-Dwꜣ-tꜣ,wj Wt,j-Jnp,w wr-mḏ-Šmꜥ,w (j)r(,j-j)ḫ(,t)-nswt ḫrp-ꜥḥ (j)m(,j)-rʾ-mšꜥ mr,y-nb≡f mrr,w-nb≡f Mr-jb

Translations (2)

EN AI · OpenAI gpt-4o-mini (from scholarly German)
The physical son of the king, courtier, lector priest, god's seal bearer of the bark (named) Ba-netjeru, god's seal bearer of the bark (named) Dua-tawi, embalmer of Anubis, Great One of the Ten of Upper Egypt, steward of the royal estate, palace director, chief of the army, beloved of his lord and one beloved by his lord, Mer-ib.
DE scholarly · TLA / ORAEC
Der leibliche Königssohn, Höfling, Vorlesepriester, Gottessiegler der Barke (namens) Ba-netjeru, Gottessiegler der Barke (namens) Dua-tawi, Balsamierer des Anubis, Großer der Zehn von Oberägypten, Verwalter des Königsvermögens, Palastleiter, Vorsteher des Heeres, der von seinem Herrn Geliebte und ein von seinem Herrn Geliebter, Mer-ib

Connections

Found at Giza

Cross-references (2)

  • TLA-Text A4FXEW4C2JEKNIUGENS7NSSRLQ tier-1
  • ORAEC-id oraec5283 tier-2
About this record's data
  • From the source institution — accession, description, dimensions, and dating are as catalogued by ORAEC (Online Resource for Ancient Egyptian Corpus).
  • AI-inferred — the image-analysis panel (deities, names, signs) is machine-generated and may be wrong.
  • Approximate location — most map points are plotted at the site centroid, not the exact findspot.
  • Inferred links — cross-references marked with a match method other than explicit-source-field were matched by us, not stated by the source.