Receipt 373 AD
Receipt for work done by Valerius on the dike of Ptolemais Harbor
The same ancient text or artifact as recorded by 12 records across 3 independent projects, recognised as one entity by its TM-Text identifier. View on Trismegistos →
A receipt issued by Aurelius Ptoleminos of Ptolemais Hormou, an official connected with the public dikes of the Arsinoite city, to Aurelius Valerius of Karanis, acknowledging that Valerius completed his assigned five naubia of earthwork on the canal of Ptolemais Hormou for the first indiction. It was written by Aurelius Komon on Ptoleminos' behalf at Karanis in April 373.
A naubion was a unit of earth-moving work owed as compulsory labour on dikes and canals. The word read as 'sailor' (nautes) is odd for a dike official and may be an error for a similar title.
Working translation of the DDbDP edition, made with Claude Opus 5.5 from the edition and the catalogue records shown below (catalogued as Certificate for Performance of Irrigation Corvée). It has not been reviewed by a papyrologist: check the edition before citing. Restorations follow the edition; […] marks lost text and (?) an uncertain reading.
Receipt for work done by Valerius on the dike of Ptolemais Harbor
Receipts (Certificate) for work performed on the embankments by two men
[r] Αὐρήλιος Πτολεμῖνος Ερ[…] ἀπὸ Πτολεμαίδος ὅρμου ναύτης δημοσίων χωμάτων τῆς Ἀρσινοειτῶν πόλεως Αὐρηλίῳ Οὐαλερίῳ Ἀντιουρίου ἀπὸ κώμης Καρανίδος τοῦ Ἀρσινοείτου νομοῦ. ὁμολογῶ πεπληρῶσθαι παρὰ σοῦ τὰ αἱροῦντα σοὶ ναύβια διώρυγος Πτολεμαείδος ὅρμου ναύβια πέντε τῆς α νέας ἰνδικτ…
Αὐρῆλις Πτολεμῖνος ναύτης χωμάτων ἔχειν παρʼ αὐτοῦ τόν ὁμολογοῦντα Ἀμάεις διάκων ναύβιον ἓν ἥμισυ πλήρης Φαρμοῦθι ιε ιϛ ἰνδικτίονος. Αὐρήλιος Πτολεμῖνος ἐξεδόμην τὴν ἀποχὴν ὡς πρόκιται. Τιμόθεος ἔγραψα ὑπὲρ αὐτοῦ ἀγραμμάτου. Αὐρῆλις Πτολεμῖνος ναύτης χωμάτων ἔχειν παρʼ αὐτοῦ τὸν …
Αὐρήλιος Πτολεμῖνος[…] Αὐρηλίῳ Οὐαλερίῳ· ἐπλήρωσας ὑπὲρ ϛ ἰνδικτίονος ἐπὶ τῶν χωμάτων ὑπὲρ τοῦ ἀφυλισμοῦ ναύβια τρία μόνα. Αὐρήλιος Ἰσίδωρος ἀπὸ Καρανίδος ἔγραψα.
Spotted an error, a mis-mapped findspot, or have a suggestion? We read every note.